Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550720›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026

Using "Own-Point-of-View" Video and Stimulated Recall to Reveal Physician Thought Processes: A Methodology Paper.

Milisa Manojlovich, Caitlin Cassady, Sarah J Parker, Ellie Davis, Charlotte Ahr, David Ryamukuru, Anna Wang, Kalyan Pasupathy, Hardeep Singh, Prashant Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Milisa ManojlovichUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Caitlin CassadyUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sarah J ParkerUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ellie DavisUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Charlotte AhrUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
David RyamukuruUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Anna WangUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kalyan PasupathyUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Hardeep SinghBaylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Houston, Texas.
Prashant MahajanUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVideo methods used in medicine have been described as the "gold standard" because they show events as they occurred and with a level of detail unattainable when events are reconstructed using other methods. In stimulated recall, video or pictures during interviews prompt discussion about participants' thoughts or feelings when images were captured. Coupled with video, stimulated recall can deepen researchers' understanding of a participant's thinking at the time. However, conducting video-based stimulated recall interviews with participants is poorly described in the literature because of word count limits in today's journals. In this paper we describe how we used video with stimulated recall interviews to learn how the diagnostic process evolves for emergency physicians.

methodsWe used the theory of distributed cognition to describe how information processing develops over time and occurs across physicians, the technologies used, and social organization. We conducted a qualitative study, collecting data in pediatric and adult emergency departments (ED) of an academic Level I trauma center. Participants wore head-mounted video cameras for two hours while providing care to ED patients and revealed their thinking throughout the diagnostic process in subsequent stimulated recall interviews. We reviewed video recordings to identify situations related to the diagnostic process or to one of the concepts in distributed cognition. We identified short video clips from each session to display during interviews and prepared accompanying questions. Stimulated-recall interviews were conducted using video conferencing technology, audio recorded, transcribed, and verified for accuracy. We used content analysis to analyze results.

resultsEleven attending physicians from February 2022-May 2023 (five from the pediatric ED and six from the adult ED) interacted with 52 patients over a total of 24.4 hours on video. We obtained patients' permission to film encounters before a participating physician provided care, wearing the head-mounted camera. We conducted individual stimulated recall interviews (mean 53 minutes, range 33-63 minutes) with all 11 physicians, which uncovered perspectives beyond what was revealed on film. For example, the complexity of cognition resides in patients as well as physicians. Thus, physicians must exert great effort to elicit the patient story and make a likely diagnosis in the chaotic, noisy environment of the ED.

conclusionUsing innovative methods to uncover emergency physicians' cognitive processes has the potential to advance our understanding in other settings. This methodology brings awareness to how one's thoughts can become visible and, thus, amenable to reflection and change.

Indexed as

Mental RecallPhysiciansVideo RecordingEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42550720
PMCPMC13436663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.