ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Association of Pregnancy Documentation with Radiological Imaging in the Emergency Department.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergency department (ED) encounters are common for pregnant individuals in the United States. Radiological imaging is frequently ordered for diagnostics in the ED but generally avoided during pregnancy. This study examines missed pregnancy documentation and the association of pregnancy documentation with radiological imaging among individuals who have an ED encounter while pregnant.
methodsWe used a retrospective cohort of pregnant individuals who had a live birth in an urban county in Indiana 2022-2023. We pulled all ED encounters occurring between 42-279 days of gestation (N = 4,597) that did not occur within five days of delivery. Our primary outcome measure was pregnancy documentation in the patient's electronic health record and receipt of radiological imaging (radiograph and computed tomography) of the chest, abdomen or spine. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regressions for the analysis.
resultsPregnancy was not documented in 273 of the 4,597 encounters (5.9%). A larger percentage of encounters with missed pregnancy documentation occurred with non-Hispanic Black patients (162/273, 59.3%) compared to non-Hispanic White patients (75/273, 27.5%); (odds ratio 1.70, 95% CI, 1.21-2.41) for non-Hispanic Blacks relative to non-Hispanic Whites. Radiological imaging occurred in 147 of the 4,324 encounters with a documented pregnancy (3.4%), compared with 30 of the 273 encounters where the pregnancy was not documented (11.0%). Missed pregnancy documentation was associated with 2.11 times (95%CI, 1.30-3.42) the odds of receiving radiological imaging when adjusted for confounders.
conclusionMissed pregnancy documentation occurred in 5.9% of emergency encounters with pregnant patients. While this is uncommon, it is still significantly associated with receipt of radiological imaging. Disparities in odds of pregnancy documentation in the ED may contribute to differences in maternal outcomes and highlights the necessity of ensuring equitable care for all pregnant individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.