ReviewThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Emergency Medicine Management of Distal Radius and Ulna Fractures: Narrative Review.
Review in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceDistal radius fractures and distal ulna fractures are common orthopedic injuries treated in emergency departments (ED). Our goal in this narrative review was to present emergency physicians with a single source that covers the evaluation and treatment of distal radius fractures and distal ulna fractures across the lifetime of our patients. There are differences in the treatment algorithms for distal radius fractures between pediatric, young adult, and geriatric patients. OBSERVATIONS: Pediatric distal radius fractures are defined by their relation to the growth plate and are influenced by the gradual calcification of the developing bone. Some pediatric distal radius fractures can heal through significant displacement, while others require anatomical reduction to limit the risk of growth arrest. For adult patients with a distal radius fracture, there are established guidelines for both appropriate reduction goals and for when operative treatment is indicated. For geriatric patients, management strategies have evolved over the last decade after multiple studies demonstrated no functional difference between operative and nonoperative management. Given this, most geriatric distal radius fractures are managed nonsurgically, which makes effective reduction in the ED important to optimize long-term wrist function. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Emergency physicians need to be well versed at both identifying fracture patterns and be knowledgeable about radiographic fracture-reduction goals. This emergency medicine-focused and illustrated narrative review will assist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in meeting those goals. We also summarize pain management, splint molding, possible complications and follow-up considerations for emergency physicians treating patients with distal radius fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.