ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026
Stronger legacy-effects of forest fertilization on soil saprotrophic fungi than on ectomycorrhizal fungi in the first decade after clearcutting.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensive forest management practices, such as fertilization and clearcut harvesting, are known to severely disturb biodiversity in boreal forests, but to what extent fertilization effects are still detectable after clearcutting is currently not well understood. Here we used a space-for-time approach in clearcuts of fertilized and unfertilized forests to study the dynamics of soil fungal communities after clearcutting. We re-analysed data on fungal communities in the soil organic layer of 48 clearcuts in Sweden, spanning 1-13 years post-harvest. Clearcuts of previously fertilized forests were paired with clearcuts of unfertilized forests with similar characteristics. Ectomycorrhizal fungi disappeared after clearcutting, while saprotrophic fungi initially increased in abundance and subsequently decreased as ectomycorrhizal fungi reappeared. This effect was especially pronounced for saprotrophic agaricomycetes (Mycena, Luellia, and Trechispora) and in clearcuts of fertilized forests. We conclude that certain saprotrophic agaricomycetes respond to a transient release from Gadgil suppression by ectomycorrhizal fungi and/or an increase in substrate availability after clearcutting. Saprotrophs were particularly prolific in previously fertilized stands, in line with rapid disappearance of additionally accumulated belowground organic matter, whereas ectomycorrhizal fungal communities were little impacted by previous fertilization during the first decade after clearcutting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.