ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026
Social organization in a one-male group of red-tailed monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius): insights from two proximity thresholds.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Primates exhibit diverse social structures, yet how proximity reflects social relationships may depend on the spatial threshold applied. This study examined within-group social relationships in red-tailed monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius) in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania, by comparing two proximity thresholds, 5 m and 1 m. Proximity data were collected from one group over 122 days and used to construct separate proximity networks for each threshold. In the 5-m network, the adult male occupied the most central position and was approached more frequently by other group members than he approached them. In contrast, in the 1-m network, the adult male was peripheral, whereas females were relatively more central, with especially strong ties concentrated in specific dyads. These results indicate that different proximity thresholds reveal different aspects of within-group social organization within the same group. In this one-male group, broader spatial associations were centered on the resident male, whereas closer-range associations were more female-centered and selective. By showing that the apparent social structure of the same group varies with the spatial threshold used to define proximity, this study provides a new perspective on social organization in arboreal primates forming one-male groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.