ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Multi-source information fusion using CNN-LSTM-Attention for bone layer recognition in robotic orthopedic grinding.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epiphyseal opening requires precise localization for bony bridge resection. Traditional surgery is challenged by unclear bony bridge boundary localization and inaccurate grinding precision, while existing robot-assisted operations predominantly focus on pre-operative localization with limited intraoperative autonomous decision-making capabilities. To address this, we propose a multi-source information fusion framework using a CNN-LSTM-Attention network for real-time bone layer differentiation, specifically identifying idling, cancellous, and cortical bone states, during robotic orthopedic grinding. First, the mapping relationship between acceleration, force and acoustic signals and bone density is analyzed, serving as the basis of bone layer recognition. Second, a three-channel parallel late-feature-fusion CNN-LSTM-Attention network is established. The dataset was constructed from multiple independent grinding trials with trial-wise splitting to prevent data leakage under representative robotic grinding conditions. Over five independent runs, the proposed method achieves a test accuracy of 95.06% ± 0.53%, significantly outperforming comparison models including CNN, CNN-Attention, CNN-LSTM, and non-deep-learning baselines (Random Forest, Extra Trees, SVM, KNN). Ablation studies isolating CNN, LSTM, and Attention contributions are provided, and the learned Squeeze-and-Excitation attention weights are visualized to confirm dynamic cross-modal feature weighting. With approximately 0.32 million parameters, the model introduces an inference latency of 2.8 ms on a desktop CPU and 1.2 ms on an NVIDIA Jetson Orin, well below the 50 ms robot control cycle, confirming real-time feasibility. Additionally, we explore single-signal, dual-signal, and triple-signal fusion settings, demonstrating that tri-modal fusion achieves the best performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.