ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Novel Use of Inertial Measurement Units to Drive Inverse Kinematics Model to Estimate Motion During Military Parachute Tethered Tandem Bundle Operations.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Military free-fall parachute operations subject Service Members to sudden mechanical loads during tether snatch and canopy opening, creating a high risk of musculoskeletal injury. Traditional video-based motion capture is impractical in these environments, limiting the ability to estimate joint-level kinematics in vivo. This study evaluated the feasibility of integrating wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) with musculoskeletal modeling to capture neck and shoulder kinematics during operational parachute jumps. Experienced parachutists conducted high-altitude low opening (HALO), high-altitude high opening (HAHO), and no-bundle jumps while equipped with seven synchronized IMUs positioned on the head, torso, and arms. Data were processed with the OpenSim OpenSense framework using a modified upper-body model. Model scaling was based on each subject's standing height, generic range of motion limits were applied, and calibration relied on an iterative alignment of the sensor orientations obtained while participants stood in a neutral anatomical posture. These methodological choices enabled analysis under operational conditions but also introduced potential sources of error, including calibration drift due to sensor shifts, lack of segment-specific scaling, and the absence of subject-specific joint range of motion data. Despite these challenges, the framework successfully generated estimates of neck and shoulder kinematics across jump types, demonstrating feasibility in a setting where conventional motion capture systems cannot be used. This work demonstrates the feasibility, promise, and current limitations of IMU-driven inverse kinematics in extreme environments. Lessons learned emphasize the need for individualized segment scaling, subject-specific range of motion measurements, and improved calibration protocols. By addressing these challenges in future research, IMU-based musculoskeletal modeling can become a powerful tool for integrating human biomechanics into parachute system design, protective equipment development, and training strategies aimed at reducing injury risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.