SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Brain metastases in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review of current trends, treatment strategies, and outcomes.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with a high risk of early central nervous system dissemination and poor outcomes after brain metastasis (BM). This systematic review summarizes current evidence on incidence, treatment strategies, outcomes, guidelines, and ongoing trials in TNBC-associated BM.
methodsThe review followed PRISMA guidance and was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF.IO/6TDRF). MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through January 17, 2026. Eligible records comprised randomized trials, prospective, retrospective, and ambispective cohorts, registry analyses, case series, guideline or consensus documents, and registered clinical trials reporting TNBC-specific CNS data. Data were extracted independently and synthesized descriptively because clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded quantitative meta-analysis.
resultsForty-three records met the inclusion criteria: 27 clinical studies (25 addressing parenchymal brain metastases and two addressing leptomeningeal metastases), seven guideline or consensus documents, and nine ongoing clinical trials. Across clinical studies, 67,290 patients were included; 2,555 patients had TNBC and developed CNS involvement. SRS achieved 1-year local control rates of 90-99% in selected patients with limited intracranial disease, but distant intracranial relapse remained frequent. Whole-brain radiotherapy was commonly used for extensive disease and was associated with poorer survival in observational cohorts. Among systemic options, sacituzumab govitecan had the most consistently reported TNBC-specific intracranial signal, although current evidence did not establish comparative superiority.
conclusionTNBC-associated BM remains linked to substantial morbidity, mortality, and limited prospective evidence. SRS is preferred for appropriately selected patients with limited disease. Sacituzumab govitecan has the most consistently reported TNBC-specific CNS activity, but no systemic agent has established superiority in prospective TNBC-specific CNS trials. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.