ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Enhanced urinary CXCL10 levels: a key urinary marker for rejection in kidney graft recipients.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
back groundKidney transplantation remains the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, acute rejection after transplantation is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity. This study investigates the role of CXCL10 and its receptor CXCR3 as early, non-invasive predictors of rejection by quantifying their mRNA and protein levels in both blood and urine during the first week post-transplant, addressing the limitations of serum creatinine and biopsy. METHODS AND
resultsThe study included 65 adult kidney transplant recipients, divided into a rejected group (n = 27) and a non-rejected group (n = 38). Blood and urine samples were collected during the first week after transplantation. mRNA and protein levels of CXCL10 and its receptor CXCR3 were quantified using SYBR Green real-time PCR and ELISA, respectively. Urinary CXCL10 transcript (AUC = 0.8, P = 0.0002), CXCL10 protein (AUC = 0.79, P = 0.007) and CXCR3 transcript (AUC = 0.83, P = 0.0001) showed relatively high accuracy for detecting inflammation in KTRs. When comparing rejected versus non-rejected groups, urinary CXCL10 transcript demonstrated reliable diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.74, P = 0.02). By contrast, urinary CXCL10 protein had lower diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.58, P = 0.53). CXCR3 transcript and protein levels were higher in rejected compared with non-rejected KTRs in both blood and urine, but these markers did not reliably distinguish between rejected and non-rejected recipients.
conclusionUrinary CXCL10 and CXCR3 markers showed rising transcript and protein levels in kidney transplant recipients, correlating with inflammation and suggesting their potential as noninvasive, early biomarkers to predict rejection within the first week post-transplant. While findings support integrating these markers into graft monitoring, standard thresholds require validation before clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.