Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550362›Full record

ReviewCognitive processing2026

Context brings back all the memories: a review of the physical context reinstatement effect on episodic memory.

Elif Yüvrük

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elif YüvrükDepartment of Psychology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey. elifyuvruk@mu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context reinstatement can be defined as an effect that enhances memory by reinstating contextual features from the encoding phase during retrieval. Early experimental studies revealed varying degrees of this effect in both recall and recognition memory tasks. These findings led to the development of different hypotheses regarding the factors influencing context reinstatement, often linking it to recollection-based memory processes. The main objective of the present review is to examine the methodological factors affecting context reinstatement with a primary focus on-but not limited to- two prevailing hypotheses: the outshining hypothesis and the item-context-ensemble hypothesis. In addition, the review critically considers the extent to which context reinstatement may be associated with recollection- and familiarity-based memory processes and the potential influence of response bias, an issue that has been largely overlooked in previous research. Reinstating the study context at test seems to aid memory in experimental designs where (i) the context was semantically rich, (ii) the stimulus was unfamiliar, (iii) the cue load was low, (iv) interactive encoding between the context and the stimulus was employed, and (v) the retention interval was relatively long. Methodological heterogeneity across studies and the tools used to assess memory accuracy may be key sources of conflicting findings. Building on the limitations of existing research, this review offers recommendations to support more systematic and insightful investigations of context effects on memory.

Indexed as

Context reinstatementFamiliarityRecallRecognitionRecollectionResponse bias

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.