ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Machine learning assisted prediction of cartilage histology using MR fingerprinting - a preliminary study.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrediction of cartilage structural properties through MRI could allow earlier detection of joint pathologies, such as osteoarthritis. MATERIALS &
methodsBovine patellar cartilage samples (n = 12) were imaged using magnetic resonance fingerprinting, followed by histological examination of proteoglycan content and collagen fiber anisotropy. The relaxation time maps and raw signal data were then used for training Gaussian process regression (GPR) models to predict the histology results.
resultsProteoglycan content was predicted by the GPR models with high accuracy (median r = 0.81, σ = 0.08 and NRMSE = 11.7%). Predictions performed using raw MRF data outperformed those done using qMRI maps. Collagen fiber anisotropy predictions found only weak correlation (median r = 0.40, σ = 0.25 & NRMSE = 26.4%) and no significant difference was seen between models trained on raw MRF or relaxation time maps. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that noninvasive prediction of proteoglycan content in cartilage from MRF measurements using a 3 T clinical scanner is feasible, holding promise for future clinical applications. Collagen fiber anisotropy could not be reliably estimated with the current setup. GPR-based prediction models were found to outperform reference linear models using the same prediction data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.