Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550347›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026

Machine learning assisted prediction of cartilage histology using MR fingerprinting - a preliminary study.

Ville Kantola, Olli Nykänen, Victor Casula, Ville-Pauli Karjalainen, Martijn A Cloos, Riccardo Lattanzi, Mikko J Nissi, Miika T Nieminen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ville KantolaResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. ville.kantola@oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9584-7500
Olli NykänenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Victor CasulaResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Ville-Pauli KarjalainenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Martijn A CloosDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Riccardo LattanziBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Mikko J NissiDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Miika T NieminenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 359186Instrumentariumin Tiedesäätiö 260014Suomen Kulttuurirahasto 354693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrediction of cartilage structural properties through MRI could allow earlier detection of joint pathologies, such as osteoarthritis. MATERIALS &

methodsBovine patellar cartilage samples (n = 12) were imaged using magnetic resonance fingerprinting, followed by histological examination of proteoglycan content and collagen fiber anisotropy. The relaxation time maps and raw signal data were then used for training Gaussian process regression (GPR) models to predict the histology results.

resultsProteoglycan content was predicted by the GPR models with high accuracy (median r = 0.81, σ = 0.08 and NRMSE = 11.7%). Predictions performed using raw MRF data outperformed those done using qMRI maps. Collagen fiber anisotropy predictions found only weak correlation (median r = 0.40, σ = 0.25 & NRMSE = 26.4%) and no significant difference was seen between models trained on raw MRF or relaxation time maps. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that noninvasive prediction of proteoglycan content in cartilage from MRF measurements using a 3 T clinical scanner is feasible, holding promise for future clinical applications. Collagen fiber anisotropy could not be reliably estimated with the current setup. GPR-based prediction models were found to outperform reference linear models using the same prediction data.

Indexed as

CartilageHistologyMagnetic resonance imagingRelaxometry

Identifiers

PMID42550347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.