ArticleInternational ophthalmology2026
Visual performance of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus IOL in stable early-stage Keratoconus: prospective pilot study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate visual performance, contrast sensitivity (CS), optical quality, and subjective satisfaction of Vivity extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) premium intraocular lens (pIOL) in early keratoconus (KC).
methodsIn this prospective, interventional, single-center clinical study, ten patients with mild bilateral KC and cataract received AcrySof IQ Vivity pIOL. Pre- and postoperative assessments included monocular and binocular uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuities at 4 m (UDVA, DCVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate and near visual acuities at 66 cm (UI66VA, DCI66VA) and 40 cm (UNVA, DCNVA), defocus curve, CS, wavefront aberrometry (RMS, PSF, Strehl ratio), halometry, and subjective outcomes.
resultsAt 3 months, mean ± SD monocular DCVA in the dominant eyes (primary endpoint) was 0.06 ± 0.13 logMAR. A statistically significant improvement was observed between preoperative and postoperative monocular and binocular UDVA, UNVA, DCNVA (p < 0.001), and DCVA (p = 0.03). Binocular DCI66VA and UI66VA were 0.10 ± 0.15 and 0.14 ± 0.16 logMAR, respectively. The defocus curve was ≤ 0.20 logMAR from + 0.50 D to - 2.00 D. CS peaked under scotopic conditions at 6 cpd, total ocular RMS improved from 2.15 ± 1.98 to 1.09 ± 0.77 (p = 0.09). NEI-RQL-42 scores indicated favourable patient-reported outcomes, particularly for glare, clarity of vision, and satisfaction with correction.
conclusionIn this small prospective pilot study, bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive EDOF IOL was associated with favourable short-term visual outcomes in highly selected patients with stable early keratoconus. These preliminary findings suggest that early stable KC may not represent an absolute contraindication to non-diffractive EDOF IOL implantation, but larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.