SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Multi-centric international 10-year review of surgical magnetic mechatronics in HPB, bariatrics, OB-GYN, urology and neurosurgery: minimally invasive technology, robot design & actuator-sensor fusion.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetically actuated surgical systems represent a disruptive class of mechatronic devices that offer a promising approach to enhance minimally invasive (MIS) procedures by reducing tissue trauma. This literature systematic review synthesizes 10 years evidence, from 2016 to 2026, on magnetic mechatronics and robotics in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB), bariatric, gynecologic, urologic, and neurosurgical applications, focusing on design principles, actuator-sensor fusion, and performance compared to non-magnetic systems. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched Scopus using specific Boolean strings for magnetic actuation in the surgical field. Eligibility required experimental validation and clinical translation, prioritizing Q1 and Q2 journals. After title, abstract, and full-text screenings, 187 of 68,956 studies were included. Data extraction focused on technical metrics like coupling efficiency and positional precision, alongside clinical outcomes such as safety and invasiveness. In this sense, a narrative synthesis grouped findings by mechanism and specialty. In correlation, key findings highlight coupling models such as dipole-dipole and gradient-driven force transmission. Indeed, performance envelopes showed sub-millimetric accuracy and improved workspaces for retraction and anchoring over conventional tools, though thermal and saturation limits persist. These systems demonstrate potential for multispecialty translation, establishing a mechatronic framework to guide future platform designs. Limitations include prototype heterogeneity and limited large-scale clinical data. This analysis underscores engineering constraints and opportunities for advanced actuator-sensor integration in MIS procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.