ArticleFamilial cancer2026
Opportunities to improve detection of genetic predisposition for ovarian cancer applying the Tumor-First workflow.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic testing in ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients is very important for patients and their relatives. The Tumor-First workflow uses a tumor DNA test to stratify germline testing for hereditary cancer predisposition as well as treatment options with PARP inhibitors. This workflow is adopted and successfully implemented nationwide. Here, we evaluated recent tumor DNA testing rates in the Netherlands to identify untested OC patient groups and optimize tumor DNA testing rates. OC patients diagnosed in 2023 or 2024 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We analyzed patient characteristics associated with the likelihood of tumor DNA testing using multivariable logistic regression. Tumor-First testing was performed for 1765 out of the 2221 (79%) OC patients. Patients diagnosed with advanced stage OC were more likely to receive tumor DNA testing (OR = 2.5, p < 0.001) than those with low-stage disease. Compared with patients who underwent surgery as primary treatment, those who received chemotherapy or no primary treatment were less likely to be tested (OR = 0.21 and OR = 0.07, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients who died within 100 days were less likely to receive testing (OR = 0.57, p = 0.003). Patients without resection after diagnosis on biopsy/cytology had the lowest Tumor-First testing rates (58% vs. 87-95%, χ2 p < 0.001). Tumor-First testing rates are high. However, OC patients that do not undergo a resection are less likely to undergo testing. With these data strategies to identify hereditary cancer predisposition in patients and their relatives can be further improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.