Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550312›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2026

Molecular investigation and genomic profiling of Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis infections in dogs from Punjab, India.

Ashok Kumar, Mandeep Singh Bal, Abhishek Verma, Vishal Mahajan, Alveena Ganai, Prateek Jindal, Gursimran Filia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashok KumarAnimal Disease Research Centre, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India. vetashok5@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0017-5153
Mandeep Singh BalAnimal Disease Research Centre, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.
Abhishek VermaDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.
Vishal MahajanAnimal Disease Research Centre, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.
Alveena GanaiDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary & Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.
Prateek JindalAnimal Disease Research Centre, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.
Gursimran FiliaAnimal Disease Research Centre, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis are important tick-borne pathogens of dogs that cause significant morbidity and may result in severe disease. A. platys is the only known intracellular bacterium that infects platelets and causes canine infectious cyclic thrombocytopenia (CICT). This hospital-based study employed molecular diagnostic tools for the detection and molecular characterization of A. platys and E. canis in clinically suspected dogs in Punjab, India. METHODS AND

resultsEighty-two dogs with clinical and hematological signs suggestive of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis were examined by conventional microscopy and PCR. Microscopic examination of Leishman-stained blood smears detected E. canis in only one sample (1.22%). In contrast, PCR detected E. canis DNA in 27/82 (32.9%; 95% CI: 23.7-43.7%) samples and A. platys DNA in 47/82 (57.3%; 95% CI: 46.5-67.5%) samples. Concurrent PCR positivity for both pathogens was observed in 19/82 (23.2%) samples. McNemar's test demonstrated a significant difference in detection rates (p = 0.0015), with A. platys detected more frequently than E. canis. Phylogenetic analysis supported the molecular identification of the detected isolates and showed that the Punjab isolates clustered with globally conserved lineages of both pathogens.

conclusionsPCR demonstrated greater sensitivity than microscopy for detecting A. platys and E. canis in clinically suspected dogs. The study provides molecular evidence detection of these pathogens in dogs presented to a veterinary teaching hospital. Because this was a hospital-based investigation of clinically suspected animals, the findings should not be interpreted as estimates of prevalence in the general canine population.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisDog DiseasesEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisAnimalsDNA, BacterialDogsFemaleIndiaMalePhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialCanineCanine anaplasmosisCoinfectionEhrlichiosisPhylogenyPunjabThrombocytopeniaTick-borne disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.