ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Molecular investigation and genomic profiling of Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis infections in dogs from Punjab, India.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis are important tick-borne pathogens of dogs that cause significant morbidity and may result in severe disease. A. platys is the only known intracellular bacterium that infects platelets and causes canine infectious cyclic thrombocytopenia (CICT). This hospital-based study employed molecular diagnostic tools for the detection and molecular characterization of A. platys and E. canis in clinically suspected dogs in Punjab, India. METHODS AND
resultsEighty-two dogs with clinical and hematological signs suggestive of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis were examined by conventional microscopy and PCR. Microscopic examination of Leishman-stained blood smears detected E. canis in only one sample (1.22%). In contrast, PCR detected E. canis DNA in 27/82 (32.9%; 95% CI: 23.7-43.7%) samples and A. platys DNA in 47/82 (57.3%; 95% CI: 46.5-67.5%) samples. Concurrent PCR positivity for both pathogens was observed in 19/82 (23.2%) samples. McNemar's test demonstrated a significant difference in detection rates (p = 0.0015), with A. platys detected more frequently than E. canis. Phylogenetic analysis supported the molecular identification of the detected isolates and showed that the Punjab isolates clustered with globally conserved lineages of both pathogens.
conclusionsPCR demonstrated greater sensitivity than microscopy for detecting A. platys and E. canis in clinically suspected dogs. The study provides molecular evidence detection of these pathogens in dogs presented to a veterinary teaching hospital. Because this was a hospital-based investigation of clinically suspected animals, the findings should not be interpreted as estimates of prevalence in the general canine population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42550312What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.