Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42550276›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Applicability of handheld laser scanning for nonmetric skeletal assessment in biological profile estimation: a preliminary two-case study.

Chloe R Cummings, Emily N Powell, An-Di Yim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chloe R CummingsForensic Science Program, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Emily N PowellForensic Science Program, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
An-Di YimForensic Science Program, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. ayim5@gmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0152-5402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn forensic anthropology, skeletal materials are commonly assessed through morphological characteristics to estimate components of the biological profile. While traditional analyses relied on physical examination of skeletal remains, digital methodologies offer the potential to supplement or replace direct observations, increasing the accessibility of forensic anthropological consultation, research, and education. However, the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) documentation techniques for nonmetric assessment remained variable and required further investigation. This study provides a preliminary investigation of the applicability of handheld laser scan-derived point-cloud models for nonmetric skeletal assessment in biological profile estimation using a two-case design. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo skeletal cases were selected from the George Mason University Forensic Science Program Teaching Collection: a 40-year-old White male and an 80-year-old White female. A total of 53 participants with varying levels of forensic anthropological training and experience were recruited from the Washington metropolitan area. Participants first conducted in-person assessments of skeletal elements and subsequently evaluated 3D models after a washout period.

resultsInter-observer agreement was generally higher for physical skeletal assessments than for virtual assessments. Skeletal sex estimation (particularly innominate traits) and age estimation via the pubic symphysis showed lower agreement and reduced inter-modality correspondence. Despite this, skeletal sex classification accuracy remained largely stable across modalities. Conversely, population affinity, despite fair inter-modality agreement, showed reduced classification accuracy in the virtual setting.

conclusionThese findings suggest that handheld laser scans do not fully replicate all aspects of nonmetric skeletal assessment, and their application should be considered trait-dependent and validated further before routine use.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonBone and BonesForensic AnthropologyImaging, Three-DimensionalLasersSex Determination by SkeletonAdultAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsForensic anthropologyInter-observer reliabilityNonmetric traitsSurface scanningThree-dimensional (3D) modelsVirtual anthropology

Identifiers

PMID42550276
PMCPMC13658533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.