ArticleEnvironmental management2026
Assessing Seafloor Litter Classification: Lessons from an Online Proficiency Test.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seafloor litter is an applied indicator for the assessment of marine pollution. Harmonized seafloor litter categorization is essential for quality assured assessments. This study aimed to assess the quality of seafloor litter classification and the effectiveness of the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES) seafloor litter categorization guidelines through an online proficiency test. Participants classified pictures of seafloor litter from trawls based on the ICES manual and photo guide. The test identified correlations between users' experience and classification accuracy. Findings demonstrated participants had a good ability to classify seafloor litter items based on the guidelines with an average accuracy rate of 83%. Some items were misclassified, but these errors could not be linked to the experience of the participants. Misclassifications during the proficiency test could be related to the nature of the picture-based assessment, a lack of participant knowledge of seafloor litter, and/or a lack of clarity in classification guidelines. The results of the test can be used as part of quality assurance measures to strengthen monitoring guidelines, future data collection and improve our understanding of potential human error in seafloor litter datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.