ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
[Prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedics and traumatology: Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement 2026].
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a disease entity comprising deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), represents one of the most frequent and potentially life-threatening complications in orthopaedics and traumatology [1]. The previous Austrian recommendation on VTE prophylaxis in musculoskeletal procedures, dating from 2014 [2], no longer adequately reflects current evidence-based pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies. Current international interdisciplinary guidelines on VTE prophylaxis, such as those issued by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) [3] and the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) [4], were therefore adapted with consideration of Austrian healthcare structures. In particular, clearly defined criteria for a functional early mobilisation concept within the framework of a fast-track programme, as well as structured recommendations on VTE prophylaxis in conservative orthopaedic and traumatological treatments, have been lacking to date. To develop practice-oriented, evidence-based recommendations, an interdisciplinary consensus group comprising representatives of the Austrian medical societies relevant to this topic was convened. The aim was to formulate more structured, risk-adapted recommendations that take the Austrian healthcare context into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.