ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
Experiences and perceptions of occupational therapy and physiotherapy practice education in research settings.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences and perceptions of occupational therapy and physiotherapy practice education in research settings.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPractice education is an essential component of occupational therapy programmes in Australia, providing supervised opportunities for students to develop skills across diverse practice settings. Rising student enrolments have intensified pressure on universities to secure sufficient practice education opportunities, prompting exploration of alternative models and emerging settings. The research setting, with supervision provided by occupational therapists working in research roles, presents a promising but under-utilised option for practice education.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of occupational therapy and physiotherapy students, practitioners, and university educators on placements in a research setting.
methodsSemi-structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted with occupational therapy and physiotherapy students, practitioners with experience working in research-specific roles, and university educators. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the development of the interview schedules. Participants were recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling. Data were analysed thematically. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: The interview schedule was developed in consultation with research practitioners and university educators.
findingsPractice education is occurring within research settings, though it is not yet common, with generally positive perceptions reported among those involved. Participants viewed these placements as an opportunity to strengthen research confidence, develop research readiness, and generate interest, alongside meeting core placement competencies. For some participants, practice education in a research setting was a new concept. University educators questioned whether all research settings could satisfy accreditation requirements. Seven themes were identified: research confidence, professional responsibility, sparking interest, missed opportunity, accreditation requirements, fear of missing out on client contact, and risks to the research quality.
conclusionUtilisation of the research setting for practice education may strengthen students' understanding of how evidence is generated and translated into practice, helping to address persistent concerns about low research confidence and engagement. Effective implementation will require collaboratively developed models that reflect the needs of all stakeholders. Ongoing trial and evaluation are essential to determine feasibility, educational value, and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.