ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Comparative evaluation of probe-capture and conventional metagenomic sequencing across multiple clinical sample types, with analysis of paired bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and blood samples.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) suffers from host nucleic acid interference and poor performance in low-biomass samples. Probe-capture metagenomic sequencing (PC-mNGS), which enriches microbial targets via hybridization probes, shows superior sensitivity but lacks systematic multi-sample evaluations. This study compared PC-mNGS and mNGS across diverse clinical specimens (bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [BALF], blood, cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) and assessed the clinical utility of pathogen co-detection in paired BALF-blood samples from sepsis patients. A total of 282 samples (81 BALF, 141 blood, 25 CSF, 35 others) sequenced by both PC-mNGS and mNGS were analyzed. Additionally, 621 paired BALF-blood samples from sepsis patients with pulmonary infections were evaluated. PC-mNGS achieved higher pathogen detection rates (66.67% vs 57.10%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.