ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026
Tuning out emotional distractors by tuning in theta rhythm: improving visual working memory using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The relation between attentional control and visual working memory (vWM) has previously been studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). For example, it has been shown that rhythmic TMS (rhTMS) can enhance attentional control and, consequently, vWM performance, by boosting prefrontal theta rhythm power. However, it remains unclear if the rhTMS protocol used to improve attentional control for neutral valence distractors can do the same for emotional distractors. Moreover, attentional control can be applied in different ways, either by amplifying relevant stimulus representation or by inhibiting distractor processing. In this study, we used rhTMS to increase theta power over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in 19 healthy participants during a visual change-detection task. Auditory distractors with neutral and angry prosodies were heard during the task. Electroencephalography was used to measure theta power, contralateral delay activity, which indexes visual item maintenance, and the auditory P2, which indexes distractor processing. rhTMS boosted theta power and improved vWM accuracy compared to the sham condition. Theta boost was associated with lower emotional distractor processing, but not better maintenance. Our results indicate that the mechanism for attentional control of emotional auditory distractors in the vWM context is based on inhibition rather than amplification of relevant items.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.