Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549771›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescence2026

Interpersonal Predictors of Youth Internalizing Symptom Trajectories During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Nicole S J Dryburgh, Ryan Miller, Eric Duku, Katherine T Cost, Yun-Ju Claire Chen, Jordan Edwards, Emma Nolan, Katholiki Georgiades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole S J DryburghOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1324-0164
Ryan MillerOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6437-5609
Eric DukuOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3599-3527
Katherine T CostDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9208-3696
Yun-Ju Claire ChenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0659-2110
Jordan EdwardsOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-3795
Emma NolanDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland.
Katholiki GeorgiadesOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Ontario Ministry of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted youths' interpersonal relationships, posing risks for internalizing distress. Yet, evidence remains limited beyond the early pandemic waves and with changing interpersonal contexts. This study examined trajectories of youth internalizing symptoms across five timepoints of the pandemic and associations with parental support and social interactions (in-person vs. virtual).

methodData were from the population-based COVID-19 Ontario Provincial Assessment and Tracking of Child and Family Health study in Canada. Youth (N = 176; 10-18 years; 51.4% girls, 43.5% boys) participated in up to five waves between January 2021 and December 2022. Linear mixed-effects models were conducted with internalizing symptoms as the outcome and age, gender, parental support, and in-person and virtual social interactions as predictors.

resultsGirls (b = 0.21, p = 0.005), gender minority youth (b = 0.60, p < 0.001), and older youth (b = 0.07, p < 0.001) reported greater symptoms; girls showed steeper increases over time (b = 0.01, p = 0.006), reflecting widening gender disparities. Greater baseline parental support was associated with fewer symptoms (b = -0.33, p < 0.001), with a stable effect over time. In-person and virtual interactions were unrelated to symptoms at baseline; however, over time, more frequent in-person interactions were increasingly associated with fewer symptoms (b = -0.01, p = 0.005). Virtual interactions remained unrelated.

conclusionsInternalizing symptoms increased modestly across the study period, with widening disparities for girls that extended well beyond periods of lockdown. In-person social interactions became increasingly protective, whereas parental support showed a stable protective association. Findings highlight the importance of gender-responsive supports and family relationships during prolonged disruption, and in-person connections as restriction ease.

Indexed as

COVID-19Interpersonal RelationsSocial InteractionAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleOntarioSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsSocial SupportCOVID‐19longitudinalpandemicrelationshipsyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID42549771
PMCPMC13643676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.