ArticleJournal of adolescence2026
Interpersonal Predictors of Youth Internalizing Symptom Trajectories During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Journal of adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted youths' interpersonal relationships, posing risks for internalizing distress. Yet, evidence remains limited beyond the early pandemic waves and with changing interpersonal contexts. This study examined trajectories of youth internalizing symptoms across five timepoints of the pandemic and associations with parental support and social interactions (in-person vs. virtual).
methodData were from the population-based COVID-19 Ontario Provincial Assessment and Tracking of Child and Family Health study in Canada. Youth (N = 176; 10-18 years; 51.4% girls, 43.5% boys) participated in up to five waves between January 2021 and December 2022. Linear mixed-effects models were conducted with internalizing symptoms as the outcome and age, gender, parental support, and in-person and virtual social interactions as predictors.
resultsGirls (b = 0.21, p = 0.005), gender minority youth (b = 0.60, p < 0.001), and older youth (b = 0.07, p < 0.001) reported greater symptoms; girls showed steeper increases over time (b = 0.01, p = 0.006), reflecting widening gender disparities. Greater baseline parental support was associated with fewer symptoms (b = -0.33, p < 0.001), with a stable effect over time. In-person and virtual interactions were unrelated to symptoms at baseline; however, over time, more frequent in-person interactions were increasingly associated with fewer symptoms (b = -0.01, p = 0.005). Virtual interactions remained unrelated.
conclusionsInternalizing symptoms increased modestly across the study period, with widening disparities for girls that extended well beyond periods of lockdown. In-person social interactions became increasingly protective, whereas parental support showed a stable protective association. Findings highlight the importance of gender-responsive supports and family relationships during prolonged disruption, and in-person connections as restriction ease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.