ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2026
Inclusive instructional communication in higher education: A comparative policy analysis of South Africa and Malawi.
Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInclusive instructional communication is necessary for equitable participation of students with communication disorders in higher education. However, limited evidence exists on how policy and legal frameworks in Southern Africa address communicative access, multilingual teaching and support for students with communication disorders.
objectivesThis study examined how selected frameworks in South Africa and Malawi represent inclusive instructional communication for students with communication disorders.
methodA comparative policy analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis in an integrated critical realist framework. Ten documents were analysed, focusing on inclusivity, instructional communication, multilingualism, disability support and digital accessibility.
resultsThe analysed frameworks express commitments to equity, inclusivity and participation in higher education. South Africa gives attention to multilingualism and language access, while Malawi addresses broader inclusivity. However, the analysis identified limited guidance on instructional communication practices for students with communication disorders. The frameworks did not clearly specify lecturer training in inclusive communication, multimodal teaching approaches, sign language integration, augmentative and alternative communication support or accessible digital learning practices.
conclusionThe absence of explicit policy provisions for educator preparation, accessible communication practices and communication-support technologies may limit practical guidance on epistemological inclusion of students with communication disorders.Contribution: This study demonstrates how frameworks in South Africa and Malawi insufficiently address inclusive instructional communication in higher education, arguing for policies that include communication-focused lecturer development, multilingual and multimodal teaching practices, accessible digital learning environments and student support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.