ArticleDiabetes/metabolism research and reviews2026
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention Priorities Established by Consumers From Low Socioeconomic and Culturally Diverse Communities.
Article in Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDiabetic foot ulcers (DFU) continue to occur despite established prevention guidelines, yet consumer perspectives, particularly from socioeconomically disadvantaged and culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities, have been underrepresented in shaping prevention. To address this gap, we aimed to co-design a consumer-derived prevention research agenda by identifying barriers and enablers, establishing research priorities, prioritising implementation strategies, and defining meaningful outcome measures.
methodsFour sequential workshops were conducted with 11 consumers with a history of DFU in South East Queensland, including Aboriginal and Pacific Islander participants (n = 4) and those from areas of socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 8). Rapid qualitative analysis informed iterative refinement across workshops, with priorities, implementation strategies, and outcome measures ranked by participants.
resultsParticipants identified barriers across clinical, self-care, psychosocial, social, and financial domains, including feeling unsupported when trying to prevent DFU, the cognitive burden of constant vigilance, conflicting guidance, and the financial and travel costs of care. The highest-ranked research priorities were better ways to predict problems before they happen (median 2, IQR 1-4.5), formal education support (median 4, IQR 3-9), and tools to support regular foot checks (median 5, IQR 3-6). Across all three priorities, consumers consistently selected technology enabled implementation strategies, including wearable sensors, AI powered personalised learning, and smart interventions. Participants defined prevention success through quality of life, function, and confidence outcome measures rather than clinical endpoints alone.
conclusionsFor socioeconomically disadvantaged and CALD populations, effective DFU prevention must be technology enabled, personalised, and developed in partnership with the consumer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.