ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026
Bioelectronic Considerations in Biomedical Microneedles.
Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microneedles (MNs), fabricated from diverse materials and assembled into arrays, have emerged as promising platforms for transdermal drug delivery and health monitoring. However, conventional MN-based theranostic systems mainly rely on passive diffusion and often involve complicated operational procedures, limiting delivery efficiency and real-time responsiveness. To overcome these limitations, MNs have been integrated with enhancement strategies such as magnetic fields, acoustics, and electronics to achieve active and programmable biomedical functions. Among these approaches, bioelectronics offer unique advantages in flexibility, conductivity, signal processing, and closed-loop control, thereby expanding the capabilities of MN systems in drug delivery and biosensing. Despite rapid progress, current studies mainly focus on material development and device fabrication, while the underlying design logic of bioelectronic MN systems remains insufficiently discussed. Herein, this review summarizes the recent advances in MN-assisted bioelectronic systems and proposes a bioelectronic design framework based on "front-end," "mid-end," and "back-end" functionalities. This framework provides a systematic understanding of how biointerfaces, signal transduction, and electronic modules cooperatively govern system performance. By highlighting the integration mechanisms and architectural strategies of bioelectronic MNs, this review offers insights into the rational design of next-generation wearable and closed-loop biomedical platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.