ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Conditional Estimations for Seamless Phase II/III Clinical Trials Involving Multi-Stage Early Stopping.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To avoid unnecessary resource expenditure resulting from the sample size overestimation in seamless phase II/III designs, multi-stage early stopping may be incorporated in the phase III component. However, existing estimation methods for seamless phase II/III designs are primarily developed for two-stage settings and do not directly accommodate designs with multi-stage early stopping in phase III. In this paper, we develop a Score-statistics-based framework for point and interval estimation in this specific class of designs. The framework provides a design-specific formulation of conditional bias adjustment, conditional median-unbiased estimation, and Rao-Blackwellization for seamless phase II/III designs with multi-stage early stopping. Conditional on the trial continuing to phase III, the proposed framework targets valid and efficient estimation of the treatment effect for the selected arm and is applicable to a range of common endpoint distributions. Within this framework, we formulate and evaluate several representative conditional estimation procedures: the multiple iterations-based conditional bias-adjusted estimator (CBAE-MI), the single iteration-based conditional bias-adjusted estimator (CBAE-SI), the conditional median unbiased estimators with the unselected treatment group effects be estimated by their maximum likelihood estimators (CMUE-MLE) or set as zero (CMUE-ZERO), and the Rao-Blackwellized (RB) estimator. In addition, to properly quantify uncertainty around the point estimates, we derive confidence intervals based on CMUE-MLE, CMUE-ZERO, and RB. Through simulation under various endpoint types and parameter configurations, we recommend employing RB for point estimation and confidence interval, as it demonstrates superior robustness and conservative coverage probability across treatment selection and trial design settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.