ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Enhanced Fibrinolysis in Lung Cancer Patients: A Functional Assessment Using Lysis Slope Time and Fibrinolytic Biomarkers.
Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundSurgery is the cornerstone of treatment for lung cancer. However, cancer and surgery can both independently affect thrombosis and hemostasis with interrelated, but unclear mechanisms. There are currently poor methods of detection and prediction of subsequent complications. In this context, we aim to evaluate levels of fibrinolysis in peri-operative lung cancer patients, via two different approaches, to identify potential biological mechanisms and trends around surgery.MethodsPlasma samples were collected from patients undergoing lung resection preoperatively (day 0; n = 77) and postoperatively (day 1; n = 81). Blood bank plasma served as the control (n=24). Plasma lysis slope times were measured using the Lysis Timer, an automated assay that measures the rate of fibrin clot formation and subsequent tPA-stimulated clot breakdown in plasma. PAI-1 and tPA antigen levels were quantified and compared to fibrinolytic activity as measured on the lysis timer.ResultsA total of 84 patients were included. Preoperative (day 0) samples were available for 77 patients and postoperative (day 1) samples for 81 patients, and 24 blood bank plasma samples served as controls. Control samples demonstrated a median lysis slope time of 56.5 min. Patients undergoing lung resection showed significantly shorter plasma lysis slope times both preoperatively (median 33 min, p = 0.0051) and on postoperative day 1 (median 34 min, p = 0.0020) compared with controls, with no significant paired difference between day 0 and day 1 using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (median day 0: 33 min; median day 1: 32 min; p = 0.7602). PAI-1 antigen levels were significantly elevated in patients both preoperatively and postoperatively compared with controls, with no significant paired difference between day 0 and day 1 (p = 0.4816). tPA antigen levels increased postoperatively and were significantly higher than both controls (p = 0.0009) and paired preoperative levels (p < 0.0001).ConclusionLung cancer patients demonstrated shorter ex vivo plasma lysis slope times compared with controls, suggesting altered fibrinolytic potential under standardized assay conditions. These differences may contribute to postoperative complications, but the findings should be interpreted as assay-specific and require further study with larger longitudinal cohorts, medication-adjusted models, and additional in vivo coagulation/fibrinolysis markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.