ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2026
Untreated Psychosis and Healthcare-Seeking Behaviour in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study With Young People, Carers, Traditional Healers, and Healthcare Professionals.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProlonged delay between the onset of the first episode of psychosis (FEP) and initiation of treatment is common in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan. This qualitative study explored perspectives of young persons with FEP, carers, healthcare professionals, and traditional and spiritual healers (TSHs) on drivers of delayed diagnosis and treatment of FEP, to suggest interventions aimed at addressing factors contributing to prolonged duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) in Pakistan and similar contexts.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in Peshawar, Pakistan using focused ethnography as a research design. We first conducted focused ethnography using participant observation with 15 TSHs. Subsequently, data was collected through semi-structured interviews (n = 26) and focus group discussions (n = 6) with FEP individuals (age 14-25), their carers, and healthcare professionals. We used framework analysis, combining inductive and deductive thematic approaches to analyse the data.
resultsThree themes emerged from the analysis in relation to care pathways in psychosis: (1) moral-spiritual explanations legitimise spiritual healings; (2) stigma renders psychiatric disclosure socially risky; and (3) structural exclusion of inaccessibility of mental health from primary care.
conclusionPsychosis remains untreated for a prolonged time as families navigate a moral-spiritual landscape that makes TSHs the only legitimate healers, stigma makes psychiatric disclosure a threat to family honour, and absent or dismissive services make biomedical care unreachable. Engagement with TSHs represents an underutilised opportunity to develop collaborative care models that reduce the duration of untreated psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.