Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549482›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Quality-of-life and late effects after transabdominal cerclage: A nationwide matched cohort study.

Lea Kirstine Hansen, Julie Glavind, Andrew H Shennan, Niels Uldbjerg, Stina Lou, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel, Pernille Tine Jensen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06875401 (Long-Term Patient-Reported Maternal Outcomes Following Abdominal Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Birth), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06875401 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Long-Term Patient-Reported Maternal Outcomes Following Abdominal Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Birth

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2025 to 2025Enrolled1,200ConditionsCerclage, Cervical, Cervical InsufficiencyArmsAbdominal cerclage (open or laparoscopic)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lea Kirstine HansenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-3933
Julie GlavindDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-6621
Andrew H ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-3132
Niels UldbjergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6449-6426
Stina LouCenter for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-5780
Ulrik Schiøler KesmodelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-106X
Pernille Tine JensenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-6040

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF21OC0071037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA transabdominal cerclage is inserted to prevent recurrent midtrimester loss and spontaneous preterm birth. The transabdominal cerclage often remains as a permanent foreign body for years. Synthetic materials within the abdomen, cesarean birth, and prior adverse pregnancy outcomes have each been associated with long-term complications or poorer health-related quality-of-life. However, the long-term effects of a permanent transabdominal cerclage have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported late effects and health-related quality-of-life in Danish women who underwent transabdominal cerclage between 2004 and 2025. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this nationwide cohort study, women with a transabdominal cerclage were matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to two comparison groups: (1)women without transabdominal cerclage who had a cesarean birth, and (2)women without transabdominal cerclage who had a non-instrumental vaginal birth and no prior cesarean birth. Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing quality-of-life, anxiety and depression, bladder discomfort, pelvic pain and sexual health. The primary outcome was the General Health scale in SF-36. Domain- and total scale scores were compared between the groups using multiple linear regression. The study was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06875401).

resultsTwo hundred three women with a transabdominal cerclage, 90 with a cesarean section, and 98 with a vaginal birth participated. The mean General Health score did not differ between groups by a predefined minimally important difference of 10 points. Adjusted mean differences were - 4.0 points (95% CI -9.5-1.4) for women with cesarean birth and -0.6 (95% -CI-6.2-4.9) for women with vaginal birth in comparison to the transabdominal cerclage group. Mental health, bladder discomfort, pelvic pain, and sexual health symptom burdens were similar between groups. Response rates were higher in the transabdominal cerclage group, which may have introduced selection bias. Cerclage-related complications leading to suture removal after completed pregnancies were rare (3/203 women, 1.5%). Quality-of-life scores tended to be higher with longer time since cerclage procedure.

conclusionsPermanent transabominal cerclage was not associated with poorer self-reported general health compared with women without transabominal cerclage, regardless of mode of birth. These findings support that a permanent transabominal cerclage does not appear to have long-term negative health effects.

Indexed as

abdominal cerclagecesarean sectionpatient‐reported outcomespreterm birthquality‐of‐lifevaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID42549482
PMCPMC13434864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.