ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Fracture resistance of maxillary central incisor with external cervical resorption restored with biomimetic bilayered restoration technique: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: External cervical resorption (ECR) is an inflammatory process resulting in the loss of peri-cervical dentin. Calcium silicate cements have been widely used in the management of ECR; however, their limited ability to enhance fracture resistance remains a concern. To overcome this limitation, short fiber-reinforced composite may be utilized for the restoration of ECR defects. Aim: The present study evaluated the fracture resistance of the maxillary central incisor with a simulated ECR defect restored using a novel biomimetic bilayered restoration (BBR) technique. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six maxillary central incisors were included. ECR defects were prepared in the samples and restored using the following groups ( Results: The mean and standard deviation of fracture resistance of all the groups ranged from 100.3 ± 6.34 to 997.5 ± 152 ( Conclusion: BBR technique can be a promising choice for restoring teeth with ECR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.