Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Aromatic compounds analysis of Guizhou honey-sweet tobacco.

Yuge Zhao, Huifei Li, Risheng Zhong, Liang Feng, Shuqi Wang, Yechun Lin, Haitao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuge ZhaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, China.
Huifei LiBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, China.
Risheng ZhongBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, China.
Liang FengBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, China.
Shuqi WangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, China.
Yechun LinGuizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Haitao ChenBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (BTBU), Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guizhou honey‑sweet type flue‑cured tobacco is of high commercial value, but the key aroma‑active compounds responsible for its characteristic flavor have not been systematically validated at the sensory level. To address this gap, we employed molecular sensory science approaches, including aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA), quantitative gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), odor activity value (OAV) calculations, sensory evaluation, and aroma recombination/deletion experiments, on grade B and C leaves from Zunyi (ZY), Tongren (TR), and Hubei (HB). A total of 42 aroma‑active compounds were detected, of which 23 were confirmed. β‑Damascenone and phenethyl alcohol constituted the common core aromatic skeleton across samples, while ZY‑C exhibited the richest composition with 10-12 key compounds (OAV ≥ 1). Sensory evaluation results were consistent with OAV findings, with ZY‑C showing the most favorable overall aroma profile. Recombination experiments successfully reproduced fruity and floral notes but failed to adequately replicate roasted and hay‑like aromas. Deletion experiments confirmed that acetic acid, β‑damascenone, neophytadiene, phenylacetic acid, and maltol significantly contributed to the overall aroma, with phenylacetic acid and maltol identified as the key chemical basis for the honey‑sweet characteristic of HB‑C. This study provides a scientific foundation for the targeted regulation of tobacco leaf flavor.

Indexed as

aroma-active compoundsaroma extract dilution analysisflavorhoney-sweet flue-cured tobaccovolatile

Identifiers

PMID42549435
PMCPMC13431737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.