Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549370›Full record

ArticleFujita medical journal2026

Preliminary investigation of nutritional intake among female university students using the brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ).

Masato Sugiura, Harumi Kato, Keisuke Iwase, Hironori Tsuzuki, Qiongai Jin, Yumi Akashi, Mariko Umemura, Noriko Suzuki, Tomoko Tanaka, Yukie Kitamura and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fujita medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Masato SugiuraFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Harumi KatoFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Keisuke IwaseFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Hironori TsuzukiDepartment of Nursing, Toyohashi Sozo University, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan.
Qiongai JinFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yumi AkashiFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Mariko UmemuraFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Noriko SuzukiDepartment of Nursing Science, Kitasato University School of Health Science, Minamiuonuma, Niigata, Japan.
Tomoko TanakaFaculty of Health Care and Nursing, Juntendo University, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Yukie KitamuraDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing, Tokyo University of Information Sciences, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Yuki HigashimotoDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Fujita Health University, School of Medical Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Iku FujiwaraFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Naoki YamamotoResearch Promotion Headquarters, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Mikiko ShimizuFaculty of Nursing, Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the dietary intake and eating habits of female university students and compares key nutritional indicators according to the body mass index (BMI) categories and adequacy of estimated energy requirements. Methods: Dietary surveys were conducted among 50 female nursing students using the brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ). Participants were classified into BMI categories (underweight group, n=7; normal-weight group, n=41) and energy-intake adequacy groups based on estimated energy requirements (inadequate energy intake group, n=43; adequate/excess energy intake group, n=7). Nutrient intake status was examined between energy intake adequacy groups, with additional consideration of the BMI categories. Results: No significant differences in energy or macronutrient intake were observed between BMI-based groups (p>0.05). In contrast, when comparing energy intake adequacy, 88.4% of the participants in the inadequate energy intake group had insufficient carbohydrate intake, and their intakes of protein, vitamin C, iron, and folate were lower than those in the adequate/excess energy intake group (all p<0.05). Discussion: Among female university students, no group differences were detected based on BMI alone. However, in the inadequate energy intake group, marked inadequacies were observed in the intake of nutrients. These findings indicate that dietary problems cannot be captured solely by BMI and require individualized nutritional counseling. Conclusion: Nutritional assessment of female university students should incorporate BMI and adequacy of energy intake relative to estimated energy requirements, with individualized approaches tailored to each student.

Indexed as

Brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ)Eating habitsEstimated energy requirementsFemale university studentsNutritional intake

Identifiers

PMID42549370
PMCPMC13433087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.