Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549351›Full record

ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences

Evaluating the Cumulative Live Birth Rate in Autologous In Vitro Fertilization Cycles in Women Aged 40 Years and Above : A Retrospective Study.

Pallavi Prasad, Soumya Shetty, Sonia Malik, Rohit Gutgutia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pallavi PrasadDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Soumya ShettyDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, Mumbai, Maharasahtra, India.
Sonia MalikDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, New Delhi, India.
Rohit GutgutiaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Nova IVF Fertility, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In present times, many women in their forties are seeking fertility treatment because of delayed marriage and childbearing. They often face the dilemma of whether to try Aim: To evaluate CLBR in self-oocyte IVF cycles in women more than 40 years of age. Settings and Design: Retrospective study analysing patient data from the electronic medical record system of various centres of a single fertility chain between January 2019 and December 2023. Materials and Methods: Women aged >40 years who underwent one or more oocyte retrievals using self-eggs were included. Exclusion criteria were donor oocyte cycles and oocyte cryopreservation cycles. Reproductive outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate (MR) and CLBR per woman. Statistical Analysis Used: Data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Continuous and categorical variables were summarised as frequencies and percentages. Age was grouped, and treatment outcomes (OPU, embryo availability, ET, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth) were expressed as proportions by age group. Distribution between age and categorical outcomes was assessed using the Chi-square test of independence, with significance set at Results: Among 1,088 women (mean age: 41.56 ± 1.82 years), embryo formation occurred in 69.67% and ET in 62.22%. The CPR was 17.92%, MR 40%, and live birth rate 10.75%. CLBR per woman declined steeply with increasing age - 14.35% at 40 years, 9.63% at 42 years, and 0% beyond 47 years ( Conclusion: CLBR in women aged >40 years declines markedly with advancing age, with negligible live birth rates beyond 45 years despite multiple cycles.

Indexed as

Advanced maternal ageautologous oocytesclinical pregnancy ratecumulative live birth rateembryo transferin vitro fertilisation

Identifiers

PMID42549351
PMCPMC13432055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.