Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549341›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Leveraging Coaching in Plastic Surgery: An Upgrade From See One, Do One, Teach One.

Ogonna N Nnamani Silva, Natalie B Baxter, Ovya Ganesan, Simon G Talbot, Kavitha L Ranganathan, Eleanor R G Tomczyk, Charlene P Chand, Lydia A Helliwell, Dennis P Orgill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ogonna N Nnamani SilvaFrom the Harvard Plastic Surgery Residency Program, Boston, MA.
Natalie B BaxterDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Ovya GanesanGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Simon G TalbotDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Kavitha L RanganathanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Eleanor R G TomczykDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Charlene P ChandSaint Mary's College of California, Moraga, CA.
Lydia A HelliwellDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Dennis P OrgillDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coaching is a concept often associated with sports. The perceived benefits of coaching in the athletics realm have led to its increased appreciation in business and medicine. Coaching drives high performance by providing personalized guidance, strategic insights, and real-time feedback. Despite its established benefits in sports and business, it remains underused in medicine, particularly in plastic surgery. Drawing on evidence from other industries and specialties, this article explores the potential of coaching to enhance technical proficiency, accelerate skill acquisition, and improve patient outcomes in plastic surgery. By integrating core coaching principles, the processes used to develop and actualize a plastic surgeon's potential can move beyond traditional methods toward a structured, innovative approach that prepares surgeons to meet the demands of an evolving and increasingly complex healthcare landscape.

Identifiers

PMID42549341
PMCPMC13433078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.