ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
ACL rehabilitation after reconstruction: Evidence-based consensus recommendations from the German Knee Society-Part IV.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ACL rehabilitation after reconstruction: Evidence-based consensus recommendations from the German Knee Society-Part IV.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Lateral extra-articular procedures in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduce graft failure rates in elite and competitive athletes: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this consensus was to provide evidence-based recommendations for individual rehabilitation interventions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. These recommendations are intended to complement, rather than replace, comprehensive criterion-based rehabilitation protocols. Methods: A modified Delphi process conducted by the German Knee Society evaluated 29 rehabilitation topics. Evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies (A1-C) was summarized and rated by an expert panel. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement between raters. Statements were graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, specifying the certainty of evidence. Results: Consensus was achieved for 25 topics (86%). Moderate-certainty evidence (B2) indicates that early weight bearing likely results in safe functional recovery. Supervised and unsupervised exercise (A2-B2) likely results in improved strength and function. Rehabilitation lasting ≥9 months (A1) likely results in optimal recovery guided by functional progress. Neuromuscular training (A1) and proprioceptive training (B2) likely improve sensorimotor control and functional outcomes. Plyometric (B2) and eccentric exercises (B2), as well as blood flow restriction (A1), likely result in enhanced quadriceps strength and muscle mass. Core stability exercises (C) and aquatic therapy (B1) likely improve knee function and facilitate early return to activity. Adjunctive modalities, such as cryotherapy (A2), likely reduce pain and swelling; KT (C) and digital applications (B1) may improve early-phase outcomes. Interventions such as whole-body vibration training (B2) and cross-education (C) showed inconsistent or insufficient benefits. Rehabilitation should be individualized according to patient-specific factors, concomitant injuries and functional progress. Conclusion: These consensus recommendations provide a multimodal, evidence-based framework for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Following these recommendations likely reduces variability in clinical practice, supports safe return to sport and might lower the risk of re-injury. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert consensus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.