ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026
Development and Validation of a Machine-Learning Deep Plasma Proteome Classifier for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Proteome-guided liquid biopsy tests hold immense promise for the future of early cancer detection. Here, we analyzed the plasma proteome of 1,259 biobanked samples consisting of healthy women and women with breast cancer. The Astrin Biosciences' breast cancer early detection test is a laboratory developed test (LDT) that uses a protein-based machine learning classifier to identify breast cancer with high accuracy. Methods: The classifier was trained on 845 women (466 healthy and 379 with newly diagnosed, treatment naïve breast cancer) and validated on 397 women (195 healthy and 202 breast cancer) from the same collection cohort (held-out validation). All plasma samples were processed in an automated, blinded manner coupled with semi-quantitative, label-free mass spectrometry (MS)-based analysis. Results: The held-out validation performance achieved 92.3% specificity (180/195; 95% Wilson CI: 87.7-95.3%), 92.6% sensitivity (187/202; 95% Wilson CI: 88.1-95.4%) and an AUC of 0.975 (95% Bootstrap CI: 0.961-0.987). Observed sensitivity remained high across all breast cancer stages and pathological and molecular subtypes, albeit with small sample sizes for some subtypes. Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) identified epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and PI3K-AKT signaling as enriched in the breast cancer samples, highlighting that our test may possibly identify cancer-related proteins in early-stage patients. A simulated population demonstrates the utility of our test as a supplement to mammography, detecting nearly all (93%) breast cancers missed by mammography and reducing the number of false positives relative to MRI and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) alone by >10-fold. Discussion: Overall, our proteomic data demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in women with breast cancer, especially at early stages, and is a favorable supplemental test post mammogram.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.