Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549258›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026

Development and Validation of a Machine-Learning Deep Plasma Proteome Classifier for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection.

Alec Horrmann, Yash Travadi, Jacob Carey, Ella Boytim, Kevin Mallery, Grant Schaap, Carissa Rungkittikhun, Kaylee Judith Kamalanathan, Nathaniel R Bristow, Catalina Galeano-Garces and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alec HorrmannAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Yash TravadiAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Jacob CareyAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Ella BoytimDepartment of Medicine, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kevin MalleryAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Grant SchaapAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Carissa RungkittikhunAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Kaylee Judith KamalanathanAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Nathaniel R BristowAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Catalina Galeano-GarcesAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Adam GrothAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Harrison BallAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Alexa R HeschAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Pooja AdvaniDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Justin HwangDepartment of Medicine, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Badrinath R KonetyAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Justin M DrakeAstrin Biosciences, Saint Paul, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Proteome-guided liquid biopsy tests hold immense promise for the future of early cancer detection. Here, we analyzed the plasma proteome of 1,259 biobanked samples consisting of healthy women and women with breast cancer. The Astrin Biosciences' breast cancer early detection test is a laboratory developed test (LDT) that uses a protein-based machine learning classifier to identify breast cancer with high accuracy. Methods: The classifier was trained on 845 women (466 healthy and 379 with newly diagnosed, treatment naïve breast cancer) and validated on 397 women (195 healthy and 202 breast cancer) from the same collection cohort (held-out validation). All plasma samples were processed in an automated, blinded manner coupled with semi-quantitative, label-free mass spectrometry (MS)-based analysis. Results: The held-out validation performance achieved 92.3% specificity (180/195; 95% Wilson CI: 87.7-95.3%), 92.6% sensitivity (187/202; 95% Wilson CI: 88.1-95.4%) and an AUC of 0.975 (95% Bootstrap CI: 0.961-0.987). Observed sensitivity remained high across all breast cancer stages and pathological and molecular subtypes, albeit with small sample sizes for some subtypes. Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) identified epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and PI3K-AKT signaling as enriched in the breast cancer samples, highlighting that our test may possibly identify cancer-related proteins in early-stage patients. A simulated population demonstrates the utility of our test as a supplement to mammography, detecting nearly all (93%) breast cancers missed by mammography and reducing the number of false positives relative to MRI and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) alone by >10-fold. Discussion: Overall, our proteomic data demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in women with breast cancer, especially at early stages, and is a favorable supplemental test post mammogram.

Indexed as

breast cancerdense breast tissueearly detectionliquid biopsymass spectrometryproteomics

Identifiers

PMID42549258
PMCPMC13431460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.