ArticleAdvances in geriatric medicine and research2026
Conducting Screenings and Determining Primary Healthcare Provider Follow-Up for Heart, Muscle, and Brain Health in Older Adults at a Community Pharmacy: An Implementation-Oriented Pilot Study.
Article in Advances in geriatric medicine and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Frequently visited community pharmacies can serve as sites for additional healthcare, including screenings for unknown conditions. Our implementation-oriented pilot study sought to evaluate the proportions of older adults that followed-up with their primary healthcare provider about a positive cardiac arrhythmia, weakness, or cognitive impairment screening performed in a community pharmacy. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used and screenings occurred at a well-visited community pharmacy inside a clinic. Possible cardiac arrhythmias were identified with a mobile electrocardiogram. Weakness status was examined with a hydraulic handgrip dynamometer. A paper-and-pencil based cognitive assessment determined cognitive impairment status. Participants screening positive were advised to visit their healthcare provider, and follow-up for determining if such visits occurred was performed approximately 3-months later. Results: Of the 106 participants, 51 were referred to their healthcare provider for any positive screening. At follow-up, 12 (23.5%) participants reported visiting their primary healthcare provider about the positive screening performed at the community pharmacy. Conclusions: Our implementation-oriented pilot study showed promise for kindling healthcare provider follow-up regarding positive screenings performed at a community pharmacy. Conducting such screenings may reengage patients with their primary healthcare providers when appropriate, and support the identification of unknown conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.