ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2026
Amplitude of Accommodation Measured by Closed-Field Autorefractometer in Children With Bilateral High Hyperopia.
Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the amplitude of accommodation by autorefractometer in children with bilateral high hyperopia. Methods: The records of children with bilateral high hyperopia (+6.00 diopter and above) were investigated. Age, amplitude of accommodation (AA) values and pupil size (PS) changes measured by closed-field autorefractometer (Tonoref III), spherical equivalent (SE), astigmatism, presence of amblyopia, strabismus, and stereopsis were noted. Age-matched emmetropic children were also assessed as control group. Comparisons were statistically performed. Results: The mean ages of high hyperopia (n=32) and control groups (n=32) were not statistically different (p=0.905). Mean SE values were different in both eyes between groups (p<0.001, p<0.001, right and left eyes, respectively). Mean AA in both eyes were different between groups (p=0.017, p=0.02, right and left eyes, respectively). AA differences between two eyes and pupil size measurements in both eyes (right and left) were not different (p=0.90, p=0.576, p=0.35, respectively). Presence of strabismus and amblyopia were higher in hyperopia group and stereoacuity was better in control group. In hyperopia group, there was statistical difference between patients with and without strabismus regarding to mean AA (p=0.03). Conclusion: Accommodative amplitude, measured by a closed-field autorefractometer (Tonoref III) was lower in bilateral high hyperopic children. AA difference between two eyes and pupil sizes during accommodation were not different between high hyperopic patients and emmetropic controls. High hyperopic patients with strabismus were found to have better accommodative amplitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.