Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549201›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Phase similarity between similar objects indicates representational merging across retrieval training but not sleep.

Hayley Bree Caldwell, Alex Chatburn, Kurt Lushington, Simon Hanslmayr, Sebastian Michelmann

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hayley Bree CaldwellSchool of Psychology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7974-8729
Alex ChatburnSchool of Psychology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-7648
Kurt LushingtonSchool of Psychology, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-273X
Simon HanslmayrSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, Centre for Neurotechnology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4448-2147
Sebastian MichelmannDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York City, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5717-586X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval training (i.e., cued recall) is theorised to induce rapid memory consolidation, similarly to sleep. Across consolidation, related neural representations become increasingly similar; yet, representational change has never been directly compared between sleep and retrieval training to test similarities in their underlying mechanisms. In this study, 30 subjects (27F, 18-34,

Indexed as

EEG phasegist extractionmemory consolidationrepresentational changeretrieval trainingsleep

Identifiers

PMID42549201
PMCPMC13430988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.