ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2026
Automatic Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Learning.
Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Plus disease, which can be diagnosed during clinical ophthalmoscopic examinations, is the most important feature in determining retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment. In the current study, we aimed to automatic diagnose and predict plus disease based on deep learning (DL) from retinal images of infants with ROP. Methods: 600 retinal images from infants screened for ROP were evaluated. Each image was classified as normal, pre-plus and plus disease. After image pre-processing, the images were distributed into groups equal to the number of normal eye images and were used for training DL algorithms such as EfficientNetB7, InceptionResNetV2 and VGG16. The algorithms were trained with 10-fold cross-validation, and results are reported as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Of the 600 retinal images included, 258 images obtained after pre-processing were graded as 86 (33.3%) normal, 86 (33.3%) as pre-plus disease, and 86 (33.3%) as plus disease. For plus versus no-plus disease diagnosis, among the algorithms, InceptionResNetV2 achieved 0.90 sensitivity, 0.92 specificity, and 0.91 accuracy. Area under the ROC curve was 0.91. For detection of pre-plus disease or worse versus normal, the algorithm achieved 0.81 sensitivity, 0.97 specificity, and 0.88 accuracy. Conclusion: Our results showed that DL algorithms can automatically diagnose plus disease in ROP with high sensitivity, high specificity, and high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.