Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549178›Full record

ArticleContinence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Optimizing remote access to Urinary Incontinence Treatments for Women Veterans: Identifying salient features of participants' experiences with two delivery modalities.

Beverly R Williams, Kathryn L Burgio, Katharina V Echt, Karen M Goldstein, Camille P Vaughan, Ursula Kelly, Alayne D Markland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beverly R WilliamsBirmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, AL and Atlanta, Birmingham, GA, USA.
Kathryn L BurgioBirmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, AL and Atlanta, Birmingham, GA, USA.
Katharina V EchtBirmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, AL and Atlanta, Birmingham, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3805-5889
Karen M GoldsteinDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
Camille P VaughanBirmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, AL and Atlanta, Birmingham, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6713-794X
Ursula KellyAtlanta VA Health Care System, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alayne D MarklandBirmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs, AL and Atlanta, Birmingham, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6567-6744

Funding

Research and Mentoring Program in Improving Access to Incontinence Care for Older AdultsK24AG073586 · NIA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Alayne Denise Markland · 2022 to 2026
$619k
HSRD VA I01 HX002827NIA NIH HHS K24 AG073586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance and objective: Behavioral treatments are recognized as evidence-based approaches for treatment of urinary incontinence (UI) in women. However, many women do not have in-person access to qualified providers, which has led to the emergence of remote methods of delivery for behavioral treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify salient features of participants' experiences with two modalities for remote delivery of behavioral treatment for UI within a pragmatic randomized trial. Design setting and participants: Individual qualitative interviews were conducted to explore the views and experiences of women Veterans who completed behavioral treatment delivered by a mobile health application (MyHealtheBladder, MHB) or video visit via VA Video Connect (VVC). The study was conducted at 3 Southeast VA healthcare systems (April 2020 - September 2023). Interventions: MHB consisted of 56 self-administered daily sessions delivered remotely over 8 weeks. VVC consisted of a single session with a specialized UI provider. After the first 8 weeks, women identified as non-responders (based on self-reported symptom improvement) were randomized to an additional VVC session or no session. Analysis: A hybrid qualitative content analysis integrating deductive and inductive methods was conducted to identify the most frequently occurring and highly emphasized topics. Results: Of the 188 women Veterans who completed the first 8-week treatment, 41 completed the interview. Participants focused on three topics: (1) encountering technical and logistical issues in access and use; (2) interacting with the program content; and (3) finding motivation, encouragement, and inspiration. Participants in both arms of the study spoke of the importance of the structure and process of content presentation, emphasizing mechanisms for reminders, review and feedback. They also valued the woman Veterans' UI stories and provider verbal and nonverbal expressions of care and support as sources of motivation and encouragement. MHB participants reported far fewer challenges with accessing information compared to their VVC counterparts. Conclusion: Future mobile health programs should incorporate mechanisms for smooth navigation of MHB and timely provider feedback, as well as strategies to ensure patients can access VVC and are prepared for participation in ways that optimize their engagement with the behavioral treatment program.

Indexed as

Behavioral treatmentMobile healthSelf-managementTelemedicineUrinary incontinenceWomen veterans

Identifiers

PMID42549178
PMCPMC13431137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.