ArticleCureus2026
A Comparative Analysis of Distal Femur Plating and Intramedullary Nailing in the Management of Distal Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistal femoral fractures constitute a significant proportion of all femoral fractures and are increasingly common due to the aging population and high-energy trauma in younger individuals. Surgical management is preferred for most cases, with the two predominant modalities being distal femoral locking plates (DFLP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN). The choice between plating and nailing remains controversial, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment strategies based on fracture characteristics, patient factors, and surgeon preference.
objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to compare the time to radiographic fracture consolidation between patients treated with DFLP fixation and those treated with RIMN. Secondary objectives included comparison of functional outcomes at six months, as measured by the Knee Society Score (KSS), overall union rates, including delayed union and nonunion, and complication profiles, encompassing surgical site infection, implant failure, and postoperative malalignment.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between November 1, 2023, and October 31, 2025, including 46 samples. The key outcome measures included operative time, union rate, time to union, functional scores (KSS), infection rate, malalignment, and implant failure.
resultsPlating showed slightly higher nonunion and delayed union rates, especially in cases with poor soft tissue or comminution. Measured by KSS, both groups demonstrated comparable long-term functional outcomes. Plating had higher superficial infection rates due to wider exposure. RIMN showed higher malalignment, often valgus, due to technical limitations during reduction.
conclusionThere is no definitive superiority between distal femur plating and nailing. Both yield excellent outcomes when applied judiciously. DFLP is preferred in intra-articular, osteoporotic, and comminuted fractures. RIMN is ideal for simple, extra-articular fractures and for younger patients. Surgeon familiarity and patient-specific factors remain pivotal in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.