Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549175›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sociology2026

Reproductive labor, social vulnerability, and female aging: a scoping review.

Paulo Henrique Souza Roberto, Isabelle Patriciá Freitas Soares Chariglione

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paulo Henrique Souza RobertoLaboratory of New Epistemologies and Human Development, Institute of Psychology, Postgraduate Program in Developmental and School Psychology (PGPDE), University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Isabelle Patriciá Freitas Soares ChariglioneLaboratory of New Epistemologies and Human Development, Institute of Psychology, Postgraduate Programs in Developmental and School Psychology (PGPDE) and Social, Work and Organizational Psychology (PSTO), University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Reproductive labor, essential to social and biological maintenance, has historically been performed by women, often under conditions of social vulnerability and without formal recognition. This scoping review aimed to map the international scientific literature on paid and unpaid domestic work performed by adult and older women in contexts marked by devaluation and cumulative chronic stress, manifested in health disparities. Methods: The review followed PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines and included articles indexed in PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science, with no time restrictions. After screening 2,122 records, 41 studies were included. Results: The findings reveal that domestic work, particularly for migrant women, serves as a critical space in which gender, class, and racial inequalities are reproduced. Most of the reviewed studies were carried out in China, Singapore, and the United States and were based mainly on qualitative or mixed-methods designs. Major themes included migration and the physical and mental health impacts of domestic work. The literature shows high prevalence of psychological distress, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and symbolic and physical violence, all worsened by informality and lack of legal protection. Workers' bodies and subjectivities emerge as terrains where structural inequalities are inscribed, making visible the "colonization of subjectivity" as an effect of precarization. Conclusion: Domestic work must be understood not only as an economic activity but also as a social, relational, and neurobiological phenomenon. These factors underscore the consequences of such working conditions for the health of marginalized populations. Moreover, the mapping highlights the urgent need for public policies that integrate social protection, economic recognition, and health care for these workers.

Indexed as

aging in womendomestic workhomemakerreproductive laborsocial vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID42549175
PMCPMC13430554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.