ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Long-term risk of gynecologic malignancies in postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding and benign endometrial lesions: a cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the long-term incidence risk of gynecologic malignancy in postmenopausal women presenting with vaginal bleeding and pathologically confirmed benign endometrial lesions, and to screen for clinical independent risk factors to provide evidence for risk stratification and follow-up management of this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 696 postmenopausal women presenting with vaginal bleeding who underwent diagnostic endometrial curettage. Histopathological evaluation established the initial diagnosis; patients with initially benign endometrial pathology underwent short-term (3-month) histologic re-evaluation, and eligible individuals were enrolled in long-term clinical follow-up. We compared the distribution of pathological subtypes between initial and follow-up diagnoses and performed univariate Cox regression and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to identify independent predictors of gynecologic malignancy. Results: The initial diagnosis rates of endometrial malignancy and precancerous lesions were 15.1% (105/696) and 2.9% (20/696), respectively. Among the 118 patients with initially benign endometrial pathology, 5.1% (6/118) and 7.6% (9/118) were diagnosed with malignancy and precancerous lesions, respectively, within 3 months of initial evaluation. Of the 453 patients eligible for long-term follow-up, 338 completed follow-up (25.4% lost to follow-up), during which 16 incident malignancies and 8 incident precancerous lesions were identified. High-grade serous carcinoma constituted a significantly higher proportion of malignancies detected during follow-up (43.8%) than of those diagnosed initially (6.5%; P < 0.001). Patients with high-grade serous carcinoma had a significantly lower BMI compared with those with endometrioid adenocarcinoma or precancerous lesions (P = 0.008); however, median diagnostic delay did not differ significantly across histologic subtypes (P = 0.850). Univariable Cox regression identified RDW, endometrial thickness, and age as factors associated with the risk of subsequent neoplasia. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed baseline red blood cell distribution width (HR = 1.331, 95% CI: 1.086-1.630, P = 0.009) and endometrial thickness (HR = 4.452, 95% CI: 2.111-9.391, P < 0.001) as independent predictors of gynecologic malignancy. Conclusion: Our findings confirm that postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding and initial benign endometrial lesions carry higher long-term gynecologic malignancy risk. Given their poor tumor prognosis, standardized screening and long-term surveillance are clinically vital for this high-risk cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.