Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42549013›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2026

Scientific assessment of the 2024 post-market environmental monitoring report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 in the EU.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Antoine Messéan, Yann Devos, Fernando Álvarez, Ana M Camargo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Antoine Messéan
Yann Devos
Fernando Álvarez
Ana M Camargo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the request of the European Commission, EFSA assessed the 2024 post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) report on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810, which expresses the Cry1Ab protein. Using a weight-of-evidence approach and considering information provided by the consent holder and the Competent Authorities of Portugal and Spain, EFSA concluded that the PMEM report provides no evidence of unexpected adverse effects on human and animal health, or on the environment associated with the cultivation of maize MON 810 in 2024. Refuge compliance was generally high in Spain and fully achieved in Portugal. However, uncertainty remains in situations where clusters of small maize MON 810 fields may collectively exceed the 5-ha threshold requiring refuge implementation. No evidence of practical resistance to Cry1Ab was identified in European corn borer populations sampled in north-eastern Spain in 2024. Nevertheless, the consistently low Cry1Ab susceptibility observed in Mediterranean corn borer populations from this area between 2022 and 2024, together with unexpected field damage reported in Girona in 2021 as well as indications of resistance alleles detected in 2024, indicate that a decrease in susceptibility cannot be excluded. EFSA also considers that the current resistance monitoring strategy lacks sufficient sensitivity for the early detection of resistance evolution. General surveillance activities, including farmer questionnaires in Spain and annual literature searches, did not identify unanticipated adverse effects. However, uncertainty remains regarding the potential exposure of highly sensitive non-target Lepidoptera to maize MON 810 pollen due to the lack of implementation data on isolation distances toward protected habitats. EFSA also identified methodological and reporting shortcomings in both case-specific monitoring and general surveillance, while welcoming the continued efforts of the Competent Authorities of Spain to address data gaps and support refinement of monitoring and risk management measures. After more than two decades of cultivation without evidence of unexpected adverse environmental effects, EFSA considers that general surveillance could be streamlined to focus on two core elements: (1) a strengthened farmer complaint system, complemented where appropriate by existing plant health and pest monitoring networks; and (2) transparent and comprehensive annual literature searches.

Indexed as

Bt maizecase‐specific monitoringCry1Abfarmer questionnairesinsect resistance managementOstrinia nubilalisSesamia nonagrioidesteosinte

Identifiers

PMID42549013
PMCPMC13430504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.