ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
A case study in teaching and learning the design, conduction, and analysis of Bayesian adaptive trials through an application.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gaining clinical trial design and management experience can be challenging for students in class. Opportunities for students to participate in designing and implementing a "from scratch" design are essential to succeeding after graduating. Limited materials are available that provide meaningful opportunities for learners to practice and implement adaptive trial design. As a solution, we developed an open-source case study framework that instructors can use directly in a course to give students hands-on experience with Bayesian adaptive trial design and implementation. Materials and methods: We developed an open case study (DRIVE trial) project, which offers an instructor-ready framework organized into seven components. Each component is designed to map onto a distinct stage of a clinical trial and include materials that instructors can adapt to match their course level and chosen scientific questions. These components are tied together by a worked example in which, after comparing multiple study designs, a Bayesian adaptive design with response adaptive randomization was chosen and implemented throughout the framework. Results and discussion: The framework provides instructors with a complete, ready-to-use template for bringing adaptive trial experience into the classroom without building a case study from scratch. The study's significance lies in its broader implications for biostatistics student training and experience. The trial underscored the effectiveness of comparing study designs and the necessity for collaboration when implementing a clinical trial. This offers valuable practical training and resources for future biostatisticians, serving as a template across various fields. Supplementary materials for this article can be found online (https://github.com/BayesPhase/DRIVE).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.