Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548986›Full record

ReviewJournal of plastic and reconstructive surgery2026

Comparison of Burn Severity and Mortality Evaluation Tools in Older Patients.

Mayu Hosio, Azusa Shimizu, Hiroshi Mizuno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mayu HosioDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Azusa ShimizuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Toda Chuo General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroshi MizunoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global population of older adults is expanding at an unprecedented rate, demanding greater focus on their health care needs. Older individuals are particularly susceptible to burn injuries, and complications are more likely to develop in these patients. Therefore, accurate assessment of burn severity is essential. Among the various scoring systems used worldwide to predict mortality in patients with burns, the burn index (BI) and Prognostic BI (PBI) have been routinely applied in Japan since the 1980s. However, with both overall life expectancy and healthy life expectancy steadily increasing in Japan, the PBI may now overestimate mortality risk in today's older adults. Here, we review BI, PBI, and global burn severity assessment tools to highlight their differences and discuss their applicability in older patients, drawing in part on the authors' clinical experience.

Indexed as

Abbreviated Burn Severity IndexBelgian Outcome In Burn Injury scoreburn indexolder patients with burnsprognostic burn index

Identifiers

PMID42548986
PMCPMC13430245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.