ArticleAJPM focus2026
A Descriptive Analysis of Second Amendment Preservation Activities.
Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Statements, resolutions, ordinances, and laws explicitly protecting the Second Amendment have been gaining popularity across the U.S. For example, the Second Amendment Preservation Act was signed into law in Missouri to safeguard an individual's right to keep and bear arms, creating a Second Amendment Sanctuary State. Although declared unconstitutional, this legislation is just one example of how local and state jurisdictions are attempting to protect gun rights against perceived threats. However, the breadth of these activities across the U.S. has not been thoroughly quantified. Methods: A thorough analysis was conducted to identify Second Amendment preservation activities by legislative bodies at the local (city/county) and state levels. The year in which the activity occurred; news articles and press releases; and the exact text of the statement, resolution, ordinance, or policy were identified. Then, actions were identified and categorized to make comparisons across jurisdictions, for example, Second Amendment Sanctuary City, Reaffirming Support for the Second Amendment, or exemptions for certain types of firearms or accessories. Results: All but 4 states took a state or local action related to protect the Second Amendment. Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia did not experience any Second Amendment preservation activities. The vast majority have been passed or enacted since 2020. In addition to state-level policies and statements, actions have been taken in more than 1,300 cities and counties across the country. The vast majority of which declare the jurisdiction a sanctuary for the Second Amendment, whereas others reaffirm support for the constitution broadly or gun rights specifically. Several used templates provided by gun rights organizations. Conclusions: Gun violence is a national, state, and local problem in the U.S. Solutions to gun violence need to function at each of these levels. Activities to protect against perceived infringement of the Second Amendment have become very common throughout the country and have occurred in almost every state. The rapid expansion of Second Amendment preservation activities across the country may impede actions by public safety agencies to enforce gun laws and reduce violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.