Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548929›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2026

Family Physician Training Programs Worldwide: A Scoping Review of Criteria, Processes, and Challenges.

Fariba Ahmadi, Mostafa Amini-Rarani, Alireza Jabbari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fariba AhmadiStudent Research Committee Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2258-7220
Mostafa Amini-RaraniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4809-2237
Alireza JabbariHealth Management and Economics Research Center Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5964-4116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Despite the global recognition of family medicine as a distinct discipline, standardized criteria and unified training approaches for family physicians remain lacking. This scoping review aims to synthesize international experiences in family physician education, focusing on admission criteria, training processes, and systemic challenges. Methods: Following the 2020 JBI Manual, a rigorous nine-stage methodology was applied. Studies published in English and Persian from 1969 to 2023 were identified through a comprehensive search of six databases and gray literature. From 13,189 records, eligible studies were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's approach, and findings were structured into three overarching themes: admission criteria, training processes, and implementation challenges. Results: The analysis revealed substantial global heterogeneity in program design, community engagement, and governance. Key obstacles included insufficient community-based training, faculty shortages, and resource limitations. Programs varied widely in admission policies, curricula, and assessment methods. Conclusion: The findings highlight the urgent need for flexible, competency-based educational frameworks adapted to local health system contexts, especially in low-resource settings. Strengthening primary care requires context-sensitive strategies, sustained investment, and the development of adaptable standards to reduce global disparities in family physician training and promote equitable, high-quality care.

Indexed as

educationfamily doctorfamily physicianprogram

Identifiers

PMID42548929
PMCPMC13430069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.