ReviewHealth science reports2026
Family Physician Training Programs Worldwide: A Scoping Review of Criteria, Processes, and Challenges.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Despite the global recognition of family medicine as a distinct discipline, standardized criteria and unified training approaches for family physicians remain lacking. This scoping review aims to synthesize international experiences in family physician education, focusing on admission criteria, training processes, and systemic challenges. Methods: Following the 2020 JBI Manual, a rigorous nine-stage methodology was applied. Studies published in English and Persian from 1969 to 2023 were identified through a comprehensive search of six databases and gray literature. From 13,189 records, eligible studies were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's approach, and findings were structured into three overarching themes: admission criteria, training processes, and implementation challenges. Results: The analysis revealed substantial global heterogeneity in program design, community engagement, and governance. Key obstacles included insufficient community-based training, faculty shortages, and resource limitations. Programs varied widely in admission policies, curricula, and assessment methods. Conclusion: The findings highlight the urgent need for flexible, competency-based educational frameworks adapted to local health system contexts, especially in low-resource settings. Strengthening primary care requires context-sensitive strategies, sustained investment, and the development of adaptable standards to reduce global disparities in family physician training and promote equitable, high-quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.