ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Uncovering the structure of self-regulation: a network analysis among German primary-school children.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Self-regulation plays a pivotal role in development, contributing to overall health and success. Self-regulation encompasses several facets, both basal and complex in nature, whose interaction is not fully understood. Methods: The current study investigated the network structure of a wide range of self-regulation facets (i.e., cognitive, behavioral,, physiological; basal and complex; performance-based or affective questionnaires) in 1,657 German primary-school children at 6-11 years and again three years later. Results: At both measurement points, network analyses revealed a similar structure of two main clusters of basal self-regulation facets (one affective, one cognitive), which were linked by the complex facet planning. At neither measurement point did the network structure differ by binary sex or age (above/below 8.4 or 11.1 years, respectively), but it differed by parental education at the first measurement point. Physiological self-regulation (heart rate variability), as well as the complex facets delay of gratification and affective decision-making showed no connections to the other self-regulation facets. Conclusion: The results add to research on childhood development by indicating differentiation of the self-regulation facets across three years, with the complex facet planning playing a central role within the self-regulation network, evident by close links to clusters of affective and cognitive basal self-regulation facets. Furthermore, our data suggest that changes in structures need sufficient time to unfold in middle childhood. Although the (lacking) effects of binary sex, age, and parental education require further investigation, our results offer key insights into the self-regulation network and in childhood development, which could inform future interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.